And as a footnote, IBT was not authored by Intel it was instead authored by someone with ample arrogance to call himself "AgentGOD". Intead, the CineBench R23 Multi Core test and Prime95 Small FFTs with all AVX test selection disabled are appropriate for testing at 100% workload. Since IBT is actually an overload, I would recommend that you do not use it. ManOfArc, to address your question, as you can see in the above table, IntelBurn Test is about a 110% workload. So when observing thermal performance, it's much more relevant to monitor Power consumption than CPU Utilization. As workload increases, CPU resource activity can only increase to a maximum of 100% Utilization, while CPU Power consumption can increase well above 100% TDP, especially if overclocked. Processor temperatures respond directly to Power consumption (Watts), which is driven by workload.
INTEL BURN TEST LATEST VERSION WINDOWS
Here’s a comparison of utilities grouped as thermal and stability tests according to % of TDP, averaged across six processor Generations at stock settings rounded to the nearest 5%:Īlthough these tests range from 70% to 130% TDP workload, Windows Task Manager interprets every test as 100% CPU Utilization, which is processor resource activity, not actual %TDP workload. Utilities that don't overload or underload your processor will give you a valid thermal baseline. “Stress” tests vary widely and can be characterized into two categories stability tests which are fluctuating workloads, and thermal tests which are steady workloads. Moreover, when ambient temperature isn't mentioned, and load and idle test conditions aren't defined, the processor temperatures you see on various websites and forums can be highly misleading.
INTEL BURN TEST LATEST VERSION HOW TO
Unfamiliar terminology and specifications, misconceptions and widespread misinformation, conflicting opinions and inconsistent test procedures leaves users uncertain of how to properly check cooling performance.
Numbers get flung around like gorilla poo in a cage. As such, when engineers develop specifications, it is done using well established standards and consistent test procedures which either normalize, minimize or eliminate variables.Ĭonversely, most users approach thermal testing in a haphazard fashion without any organized or logical methodology, which is why there's so much confusion in our computer enthusiast community concerning the topic of processor temperatures. We live in a world where all our techno-gadgets operate based upon engineering standards and specifications.
0 kommentar(er)
